![senator says people spent money on senator says people spent money on](https://www.dailyherald.com/storyimage/DA/20110312/news/703129890/EP/1/4/EP-703129890.jpg)
Thom Tillis, (R-N.C.), and Democratic challenger Cal Cunningham is already expected to be the most expensive Senate race in the country’s history with a whopping $277.6 million spent, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.īut in the northeast, part of the state commercials of state Sen. North Carolina may be ground zero for the already record spending 2020 election. (WAVY) - The job they’re running for pays less than $14,000 a year, but the campaign for North Carolina’s 1st Senatorial District is already responsible for more than $4 million in spending. “ But the bottom line is that you can get away with this, at least for a while.”īallots for the state’s June 28th primary have already started arriving in voters' mailboxes.Įditor’s Note: This story has been corrected to accurately reflect that O’Dea’s campaign does dispute the accuracy of the mailer and updated with the campaigns' most recent financial figures.EDENTON, N.C. “I imagine we'll know at some point who did these flyers and I hope some action is taken,” said Wadhams. O'Dea's campaign said the campaign could take additional steps to uncover the source of the ads. “It's another insight into their character and their negative role in campaigns.”ĭivided equally among Democrats and Republicans by design, the Federal Elections Commission regularly fails to advance cases on 3-3 votes, forcing complaining parties to turn to the courts. “I think it's pretty cowardly of a group of entities or individuals who won't put some kind of an indication who paid for these flyers,” said Wadhams. In fact, I served 32 years in the military to defend it,” texted Hanks.įormer GOP state chairman Dick Wadhams said it’s highly unusual for a mailer not to include the legally required disclosure. “They have the right under America's 1st Amendment to engage in political speech and opinion, and I will not disavow that right. Hanks said he’s focused on running a grassroots campaign and hasn’t assessed the possible effects of this effort. Political observers say the funding could tighten the contest. According to the latest FEC filings, Hanks has $20,470 to spend, while O’Dea has around one million. The ads and Democratic spending will deliver a much-needed influx of money and publicity for Hanks who is the financial underdog. He does not support state or federal funding for the procedure.
![senator says people spent money on senator says people spent money on](https://assets2.rappler.com/2063157FA2174318B3B558CA38B32DC3/img/2CE4F98491B04C59837CC2FE4AFD2A2A/dick-gordon-senate-hearing-january-23-2017-001.jpg)
O’Dea has said he supports allowing the procedure early in pregnancy and later in pregnancy for medical necessity or in the case of rape or incest. He has said he believes life begins at conception and opposes abortion without exceptions, including for the life of the mother. The mailer also tries to highlight Hanks’ uncompromising abortion stance. “Coloradans have a legal right to know which organizations and donors are behind this desperate effort to interfere in the Republican primary for Senate.” In a written statement, Zack Roday, the O’Dea for Senate Campaign Manager said the campaign is planning a massive strategy to “hold these people accountable.” He said the mailers are an effort to illegally hide Democratic donors. The O’Dea mail piece arrived in mailboxes that same day. That event came on the same day a different organization, Democratic Colorado, started running a nearly $ 1 million statewide television ad focused on Hanks’ conservative credentials. ProgressNow Colorado launched a “No Way O’Dea” campaign on Wednesday.
![senator says people spent money on senator says people spent money on](https://images.indianexpress.com/2015/04/money-main.jpg)
And now at least two Democratic-aligned groups are getting involved in Colorado’s Republican primary.